What the Bible says about Prophet Muhammad – will no doubt come as a surprise to many of you because the writer is a Muslim.
A dominee (priest, parson and predikant) Van Heerden agreed to meet me at his home on the Saturday afternoon that I was to leave for Transvaal.
He received me on his verandah with a friendly welcome. He said if I did not mind, he would like his father-in-law from the Free State (a 70 year old man) to join us in the discussion. I did not mind. The three of us settled down in the dominee’s library.
I posed the question: ‘What does the Bible say about Muhammad?’ Without hesitation he answered, ‘Nothing!’ I asked: ‘Why nothing? According to your interpretation the Bible have so many things to say about the rise of Soviet Russia and about the Last Days and even about the Pope of the Roman Catholics?’ He said, ‘Yes, but there was nothing about Muhammad!’ I asked again, ‘Why nothing? Surely this man Muhammad who had been responsible for the bringing into being a worldwide community of millions of Believers who, on his authority, believe in:
- The miraculous birth of Jesus,
- That Jesus is the Messiah,
- That he gave life to the dead by God’s permission, and
- That he healed those born blind and the lepers by God’s permission.
Surely this book (the Bible) must have something to say about this great Leader of men who spoke so well of Jesus and his mother Mary?’.
The old man from the Free State replied. ‘My son, I have been reading the Bible for the past 50 years, and if there was any mention of him, I would have known it.’
1. The word ‘Messiah’ comes from the Arabic and Hebrew word masaha, which means to rub, to massage, to anoint. The religious significance is ‘the one who is anointed’ – priests and kings were anointed in consecration to their offices. Messiah translated Christ does not mean God. Even the heathen Cyrus is called ‘Christ’ in the Bible, (Isaiah 45:1)
Not one by name!
I enquired: ‘According to you, are there not hundreds of prophecies regarding the coming of Jesus in the Old Testament.’ The dominee interjected: ‘Not hundreds, but thousands!’ I said, ‘I am not going to dispute the ‘thousand and one’ prophecies in the Old Testament regarding the coming of Jesus Christ, because the whole Muslim-world has already accepted him without the testimony of any Biblical prophecy.
We Muslims have accepted the de facto Jesus on the authority of Muhammad alone, and there are in the world today no less than 900,000,000 (this was first written in 1976) followers of Muhammad who love, respect and revere this great Messenger of God -Jesus Christ- without having the Christians to convince them by means of their Biblical dialectics.
Out of the ‘thousands’ of prophecies referred to, can you please give me just one single prophecy where Jesus is mentioned by name? The term ‘Messiah’, translated as ‘Christ’, is not a name but a title. Is there a single Prophecy where it says that the name of the Messiah will be Jesus, and that his mother’s name will be Mary, that his supposed father will be Joseph the carpenter; that he will be born in the reign of Herod the King, etc. etc.? No! There are no such details! Then how can you conclude that those ‘thousand’ Prophecies refer to Jesus ?’
What is prophecy?
The dominee replied: ‘You see, prophecies are word-pictures of something that is going to happen in the future. When that thing actually comes to pass, we see vividly in these prophecies the fulfilment of what had been predicted in the past.’ I said: ‘What you actually do is that you deduce, you reason, you put two and two together.’ He said: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘If this is what you have to do with a ‘thousand’ prophecies to justify your claim with regards to the genuineness of Jesus, why should we not adopt the very same system for Muhammad?’ The dominee agreed that it was a fair proposition, a reasonable way of dealing with the problem.
– Muhammed is mentioned by name in the Song of Solomon 5:16. The Hebrew word used there is Muhammuddim. The end letters IM is plural of respect majesty and grandeur. Minus ‘im’ the name would be Muhamud translated as ‘altogether lovely’ in the Authorised Version of the Bible or ‘The Praised One’ ‘the one worthy of Praise’ i.e. Muhammad!
I asked him to open up Deuteronomy, chapter 18, verse 18, which he did. I read from memory the verse in Afrikaans, because this was my purpose in having a little practice with the language of the ruling race in South Africa.
‘N profeet sal ek vir hulle verwek uit die midde van hulle broers, soos jy is, en ek sal my woorde in sy mond le, en hy sy sal aan hulle se alle wat ek hom beveel.’ (Deut.18: 18)
The English translation reads as follows: ‘I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and I will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.’ (Deuteronomy 18:18)
Prophet like Moses
Having recited the verse in Afrikaans, I apologised for my uncertain pronunciation, The dominee assured me that I was doing fine. I enquired: ‘To whom does this prophecy refer?’ Without the slightest hesitation he answered:
‘Jesus!’ I asked: ‘Why Jesus?… his name is not mentioned here.’ The dominee replied: ‘Since prophecies are word-pictures of something that is going to happen in the future, we find that the wordings of this verse ‘I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and I will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.’
Adequately describe him. You see the most important words of this prophecy are ‘SOOS JY IS’ (like unto thee), – like you – like Moses, and Jesus is like Moses.
I questioned: ‘In which way is Jesus like Moses?’ The answer was: ‘In the first place Moses was a Jew and Jesus was also a Jew; secondly, Moses was a prophet and Jesus was also a prophet – therefore Jesus is like Moses and that is exactly what God had foretold Moses – ‘SOOS JY IS’. ‘Can you think of any other similarities between Moses and Jesus?’ I asked. The dominee said that he could not think of any. I replied:
‘If these are the only two criteria for discovering a candidate for this prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:18, then in that case the criteria could fit any one of the following Biblical personages after Moses:- Solomon, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Malachi, John the Baptist etc., because they were also all ‘Jews’ as well as ‘Prophets’. Why should we not apply this prophecy to any one of these prophets, and why only to Jesus?
Why should we make fish of one and fowl of another?’ The dominee had no reply. I continued: ‘You see, my conclusions are that Jesus is most unlike Moses, and if I am wrong I would like you to correct me.’
So saying, I reasoned with him: ‘In the first place Jesus is not like Moses, because, according to You – ‘Jesus is a god’, but Moses is not God. Is this true?’ He said: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘Therefore, Jesus is not like Moses!
‘secondly, according to you – ‘Jesus died for the sins of the world’, but Moses did not have to die for the sins of the world. Is this true?’ He again said: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses!’
‘thirdly, according to you – ‘Jesus went to hell for three days’, but Moses did not have to go there. Is this true?’ He answered meekly: ‘yes’ I concluded: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses!’
‘But dominee,’ I continued: ‘these are not hard facts, solid facts, they are mere matters of belief over which the little ones can stumble and fall. Let us discuss something very simple, very easy that if your little ones are called in to hear the discussion, would have no difficulty in following it, shall we?’ The dominee was quite happy at the suggestion.
Eight Irrefutable Arguments:
1. Father and mother
‘Moses had a father and a mother. Muhammad also had a father and a mother. But Jesus had only a mother, and no human father. Is this true?’ He said: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘daarom is Jesus nie soos Moses nie, maar Muhammad is soos Moses!’ meaning: ‘therefore Jesus is not like Moses, but Muhammad is like Moses!’
2. Miraculous birth
‘Moses and Muhammad were born in the normal, natural course, i.e. the physical association of man and woman; but Jesus was created by a special miracle. You will recall that we are told in the Gospel of St. Matthew 1:18 ‘… before they came together, (Joseph the Carpenter and Mary) she was found with child by the holy Ghost.’ and St. Luke tells us that when the good news of the birth of a holy son was announced to her, Mary reasoned: ‘…how shall this be, seeing I know not a man? and the angel answered and said unto her, the holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the highest shall overshadow thee…’ (Luke 1:35).
The Quran confirms the miraculous birth of Jesus, in nobler and sublimer terms. In answer to her logical question: ‘O my Lord! how shall I have a son when no man hath touched me? ‘ the angel says in reply: ‘even so: Allah createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith to it ‘be,’ and it is ‘ (Quran, 3:47).
It is not necessary for God to plant a seed in man or animal. He merely wills it and it comes into being. This is the Muslim conception of the of birth of Jesus. (When I compared the Quran and the Biblical versions of the birth of Jesus to the head of the Bible Society in our largest City, and when I enquired: ‘Which version would you prefer to give your daughter, the Quranic version or the biblical version?’ The man bowed his head and answered: ‘The Quranic’) In short, I said to the dominee: ‘Is it true that Jesus was born miraculously as against the natural birth of Moses and Muhammad?’ He replied proudly: ‘Yes!’ I said: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses, but Muhammad is like Moses. And God says to Moses in the Book of Deuteronomy 18:18 ‘like unto thee’ (Like You, Like Moses) and Muhammad is like Moses.’
3. Marriage ties
‘Moses and Muhammad married and begat children, but Jesus remained a bachelor all his life. Is this true?’ The dominee said: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses, but Muhammad is like Moses.’
4. Jesus rejected by his people
‘Moses and Muhammad were accepted as prophets by their people in their very lifetime. No doubt the Jews gave endless trouble to Moses and they murmured in the wilderness, but as a nation, they acknowledged that Moses was a Messenger of God sent to them. The Arabs too made Muhammad’s life impossible. He suffered very badly at their hands.
After 13 years of preaching in Mecca, he had to emigrate from the city of his birth. But before his demise, the Arab nation as a whole accepted him as the Messenger of Allah. But according to the Bible: ‘He (Jesus) came unto his own, but his own received him not.’ (John 1:11)
And even today, after two thousand years, his people- the Jews, as a whole, have rejected him. Is this true?’ the dominee said: ‘yes.’ I said: ‘therefore Jesus is not like Moses, but Muhammad is like Moses.’
5. Other worldly kingdom
‘Moses and Muhammad were prophets as well as kings. a prophet means a man who receives Divine Revelation for the Guidance of Man and this Guidance he conveys to God’s creatures as received without any addition or deletion. A king is a person who has the power of life and death over his people. It is immaterial whether the person wears a crown or not, or whether he was ever addressed as king or monarch: if the man has the prerogative of inflicting capital punishment – he is a king. Moses possessed such a power. Do you remember the Israelite who was found picking up firewood on Sabbath Day, and Moses had him stoned to death? (Numbers- 15:13).
There are other crimes also mentioned in the Bible for which capital punishment was inflicted on the Jews at the behest of Moses. Muhammad too, had the power of life and death over his people. There are instances in the Bible of persons who were given gift of prophecy only, but they were not in a position to implement their directives. Some of these holy men of God who were helpless in the face of stubborn rejection of their message, were the prophets lot, Jonah, Daniel, Ezra, and John the Baptist. They could only deliver the message, but could not enforce the Law. The Prophet Jesus also belonged to this category.
The Christian Gospel clearly confirms this: when Jesus was dragged before the Roman Governor, Pontius Pilate, Charged for sedition, Jesus made a convincing point in his defence to refute the false charge: Jesus answered, ‘my kingdom is not of this world’: If my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now is my kingdom not from hence’. (John 18:36)
This convinced Pilate (A Pagan) that though Jesus might not be in full possession of his mental faculty, he did not strike him as being a danger to his rule. Jesus claimed a spiritual Kingdom only; in other words he only claimed to be a prophet. Is this true?’ The dominee answered: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses but Muhammad is like Moses.’
6. No new laws
‘Moses and Muhammad brought new laws and new regulations for their people. Moses not only gave the Ten Commandments to the Israelites, but a very comprehensive ceremonial law for the guidance of his people.
Muhammad comes to a people steeped in barbarism and ignorance. They married their step-mothers; they buried their daughters alive; drunkenness, adultery, idolatry, and gambling were the order of the day. Gibbon describe the Arabs before Islam in his ‘Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire’, the human brute, almost without sense, is poorly distinguished from the rest of the animal creation.’ There was hardly anything to distinguish between the ‘man’ and the ‘animal’ of the time; they were animals in human form.
‘From this abject barbarism, Muhammad elevated them, in the words of Thomas Carlysle, ‘into torch-bearers of light and learning.’ ‘to the Arab nation it was as a birth from darkness into light. Arabia first became alive by means of it. A poor shepherd people, roaming unnoticed in its deserts since the creation of the world.
See, the unnoticed becomes world notable, the small has grown world-great. within one century afterwards Arabia was at Granada on one hand and at Delhi on the other. glancing in valour and splendor, and the light of genius, Arabia shines over a great section of the world…’ The fact is that Muhammad gave his people a Law and Order they never had before.
As regards Jesus, when the Jews felt suspicious of him that he might be an impostor with designs to pervert their teachings, Jesus took pains to assure them that he had not come with a new religion – no new laws and no new regulations. I quote his own words: ‘think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. for verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.’ (Matthew 5:17-18).
In other words he had not come with any new laws or regulation he came only to fulfil the old law. This what he gave the Jews to understand- unless he was speaking with the tongue in his cheek trying to bluff the Jews into accepting him as a man of God and by subterfuge trying to ram a new religion down their throats. No! This Messenger of God would never resort to such foul means to subvert the Religion of God. He himself fulfilled the laws. He observed the commandments of Moses, and he respected the Sabbath.
At no time did a single Jew point a finger at him to say, ‘why don’t you fast’ or ‘why don’t you wash your hands before you break bread’,which charges they always levied against his disciples, but never against Jesus. This is because as a good Jew he honoured the laws of the prophets who preceded him. In short, he had created no new religion and had brought no new law like Moses and Muhammad. Is this true?’ I asked the dominee, and he answered: ‘Yes.’ I said: ‘Therefore, Jesus is not like Moses but Muhammad is like Moses.’
7. How they departed
‘Both Moses and Muhammad died natural deaths, but according to Christianity, Jesus was violently killed on the cross. (for more on this topic see Crucifixion or Cruci-fiction?) Is this true?’ The dominee said: ‘Yes.’ I averred: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses but Muhammad is like Moses.’
8. Heavenly abode
‘Moses and Muhammad both lie buried in earth, but according to you, Jesus in heaven. Is this true?’ The dominee agreed. I said: ‘Therefore Jesus is not like Moses but Muhammad is like Moses.’
Further proofs, Ishmael the first born
Since the dominee was helplessly agreeing with every point, I said, ‘Dominee, so far what I have done is to prove only one point out of the whole prophecy- that is proving the phrase ‘like unto thee’ – ‘Like You’ – ‘Like Moses’. The Prophecy is much more than this single phrase which reads as follows: ‘I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren like unto thee…’ The emphasis is on the words- ‘From among their brethren.’ Moses and his people, the Jews, are here addressed as a racial entity, and as such their ‘brethren’ would undoubtedly be the Arabs. You see, the Holy Bible speaks of Abraham as the ‘Friend of God’.
Abraham had two wives – Sarah and Hagar. Hagar bore Abraham a son – his first-born- ‘… And Abraham1 called his son’s name, which Hagar bare Ishmael.’ (Genesis 16:15). ‘And Abraham took Ishmael his son…’ (Genesis 17:23). ‘And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old, when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.’ (Genesis 17:25).
Up to the age of thirteen Ishmael was the only son and seed of Abraham, when the covenant was ratified between God and Abraham. God grants Abraham another son through Sarah, named Isaac, who was very much the junior to his brother Ishmael.
– According to the Bible, Abraham’s name was Abram before it was changed by God to Abraham.
Arabs and Jews
If Ishmael and Isaac are the sons of the same father Abraham, then they are brothers. And so the children of the one are the brethren of the children of the other. The children of Isaac are the Jews and the Children of Ishmael are the Arabs – so they are Brethren to one another. The Bible affirms, ‘and he (Ishmael) shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.’ (Genesis 16:12). ‘and he (Ishmael) died in the presence of all his brethren.’ (Genesis 25:18)
The children of Isaac are the brethren of the Ishmaelites. In like manner Muhammad is from among the brethren of the Israelites because he was a descendant of Ishmael the son of Abraham. This exactly as the prophecy has it ‘from among their brethren’. (Deut.18:18). There the prophecy distinctly mentions that the coming prophet who would be like Moses, must arise not from the ‘children of Israel’ or from ‘among themselves’, but from among their brethren. Muhammad therefore was from among their brethren!
Words in the mouth
‘The prophecy proceeds further ‘… and I will put my words into his mouth…’ what does it mean when it is said ‘I will put my words in your mouth’? You see, when I asked you (the dominee) to open Deuteronomy chapter 18, verse 18, at the beginning, and if I had asked you to read, and if you had read: would I be putting my words into your mouth?’ The dominee answered: ‘No.’ ‘But,’ I continued: ‘If I were to teach you a language like Arabic about which you have no knowledge, and if I asked you to read or repeat after me what I utter i.e.
“Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him.” (Quran 112:1-4)
Would I not be putting these unheard words of a foreign tongue which you utter, into your mouth?’ The dominee agreed that it was indeed so. In an identical manner, I said, the words of the Quran, the Revelation vouchsafed by the Almighty God to Muhammad, were revealed.
History tells us that Muhammad was forty years of age. He was in a cave some three miles north of the City of Mecca. It was the 27th night of the Muslim month of Ramadan. In the cave the Archangel Gabriel commands him in his mother tongue: ‘Iqra’ which means Read! Or proclaim! Or recite! Muhammad is terrified and in his bewilderment replies ‘I am not learned!’ The angel commands him a second time with the same result. For the third time the angel continues.
Now Muhammad, grasps, that what was required of him was to repeat! to rehearse! And he repeats the words as they were put into his mouth:
“Read! in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created. Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood: Read and thy Lord is Most Bountiful. He who taught the use of the pen aught man that which he knew not.” (Quran 96:1-5)
These are the first five verses, which were revealed to Muhammad, which now occupy the beginning of the 96th chapter of the Quran.
The faithful witness
Immediately the angel had departed, Muhammad rushed to his home. Terrified and sweating all over he asked his beloved wife Khadija to ‘cover him up!’ He lay down, and she watched by him. When he had regained his composure, he explained to her what he had seen and heard. She assured him of her faith in him and that Allah would not allow any terrible thing to happen to him. Are these the confessions of an imposter?
Would an imposter confess that when an angel of the Lord confronts them with a Message from on High, they get fear-stricken, terrified, and sweating all over, run home to their wives? Any critic can see that his reactions and confessions are that of an honest, sincere man, the man of Truth- ‘Al-Amin’ – The Honest, the Upright, the Truthful.
During the next twenty-three years of his prophetic life, words were ‘Put into his mouth’, and he uttered them. They made an indelible impression on his heart and mind: and as the volume of the Sacred Scripture (Quran) grew, they were recorded on palm-leaf fibre, on skins and on the shoulder-blades of animals; and in the hearts of his devoted disciples. Before his demise, these words were arranged according to his instructions in the order in which we find them today in the Quran.
The words (revelation) were actually put into his mouth, exactly as foretold in the prophecy under discussion: ‘And I will put my words in his mouth.’ (Deut. 18:18)
Muhammad’s experience in the cave of Hira, later to be known as The Mountain of Light, and his response to that first Revelation is the exact fulfillment of another Biblical Prophecy. In the Book of Isaiah, Chapter 29, verse 12, we read: ‘and the book’ (al-Quran the ‘Reading’, the ‘Recitation’) ‘is delivered to him that is not learned,’ (Isaiah 29:12) ‘the unlettered prophet’ (Quran 7:158) and the biblical verse continues: ‘saying, read this, I pray thee:’ (the words ‘I pray thee’, are not in the Hebrew manuscripts; compare with the Roman Catholics’ ‘Douay Version and also with the ‘Revised Standard Versions’) ‘and he saith, I am not learned.’ (‘I am not learned.’ is the exact translation of the Arabic words ‘ma ana beqara’ which Muhammad uttered twice to the Holy Ghost – the Archangel Gabriel, when he was commanded: Iqraa ‘read!’).
Let me quote the verse in full without a break as found in the ‘King James Version,’ or the ‘Authorised version’ as it is more popularly known ‘and the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, read this I pray thee: And he saith, I am not learned.’ (Isaiah 29:12)
It may be noted that there were no Arabic Bibles in existence in the 6th Century of the Christian Era when Muhammad lived and preached! Besides, he was absolutely unlettered and unlearned. No human had ever taught him a word. His teacher was his Creator “Nor does he say (aught) of (his own) Desire. It is no less than inspiration sent down to him: He was taught by one Mighty in Power”. (Quran 53:2-5)
‘Without any human learning, ‘he put to shame the wisdom of the learned’.’
‘See!’ I told the dominee, ‘how the prophecies fit Muhammad like a glove. We do not have to stretch prophecies to justify their fulfillment in Muhammad.’
The dominee replied, ‘All your expositions sound very well, but they are of no real consequence, because we Christians have Jesus Christ the ‘incarnate’ God, who has redeemed us from the Bondage of Sin!’
I asked, ‘Not important?’ God didn’t think so! He went to a great deal of trouble to have His warnings recorded. God knew that there would be people like you who will flippantly, light- heartedly discount his words, so he followed up Deuteronomy 18:18 with a dire warning: ‘and it shall come to pass, ‘ (it is going to happen) ‘that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him. (In the Catholic Bible the ending words are – ‘I will be the revenger’, I will take vengeance from him – I will take revenge!) ‘Does not this terrify you? God Almighty is threatening revenge! We shake in our pants if some hoodlum threatens us, yet you have no fear of God’s warning?’
Miracle of Miracles!
In verse 19 of Deuteronomy chapter 18, we have a further fulfillment of the prophecy in Muhammad! Note the words ‘… my words which he shall speak in my name, In whose name is Muhammad speaking?’ I opened Yusuf Ali’s translation of the Quran, at chapter 114 Mankind – the last chapter, and showed him the formula at the head of the chapter:
And the meaning: ‘In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.’ And the heading of chapter 113: ‘In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.’ And every chapter downwards 112, 111, 110…was the same formula and the same meaning on every page, because the end chapters are short and take about a page each.
‘And what did the prophecy demand?’…which he shall speak in my name and in whose name does Muhammad speak? ‘In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.’ The Prophecy is being fulfilled in Muhammad to the letter ‘Every chapter of the Quran except the 9th begin with the formula:
‘In the Name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful’ The Muslim begins his every lawful act with the Holy formula. But the Christian begins: ‘In the name of the Father, son and Holy Ghost.’’
The Christian theologians are ignorant of even the ‘name of God. Because ‘God’ is not a name, and ‘Father’ is also not a name. See ‘What His Name?’
Concerning Deuteronomy, I have given you more than 15 reasons as to how this prophecy refers to Muhammad and NOT to Jesus.
Baptist contradicts Jesus
In New Testament times, we find that the Jews were still expecting the fulfilment of the prophecy of ‘one like Moses’, refer to John 1:19-25. When Jesus claimed to be the Messiah of the Jews, the Jews began to enquire as to where was Elias?
The Jews had a parallel prophecy that before the coming of the Messiah, Elias must come first in his second coming. Jesus confirms this Jewish belief ‘…Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things. But I say unto you, that Elias has come already, and they knew him not… then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.’ (Matthew 17:11-13)
According to the New Testament, the Jews were not the ones to swallow the words of any would-be Messiah. In their investigations they underwent intense difficulties in order to find their true Messiah. And this the Gospel of John confirms: ‘and this is the record of John,’(the Baptist) ‘when the Jews sent priests and levites from Jerusalem to ask him, who art thou? And he confessed and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.’ (This was only natural because there can’t be two Messiahs (the Jews were expecting a single Messiah not two) at the same time. If Jesus was the Christ then John couldn’t be the Christ!)
‘And they asked him, what then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not.’ Here John the Baptist contradicts Jesus! Jesus says that John is ‘Elias’ and John denies that he is what Jesus ascribes him to be. One of the two (Jesus or John), God forbid, is definitely not speaking the truth! On the testimony of Jesus himself, John the Baptist was the greatest of the Israelite prophets: ‘verily I say unto you, among them that are born of women there has not risen a greater than John the Baptist…’ (Matthew 11:11)
We Muslims know John the Baptist as Yahyaa. We revere him as a true prophet of Allah. The Holy Prophet Jesus known to us as Isaa, is also esteemed as one of the mightiest messenger of the Almighty. How can we Muslims impute lies to either of them? We leave this problem between Jesus and John for the Christians to solve, for their ‘sacred scriptures’ abound in discrepancies which they have been glossing over as the ‘dark sayings of Jesus’.
We Muslims are really interested in the last questions posed to John the Baptist by the Jewish elite- ‘Art thou that prophet? And he answered, no.’ (John 1:21)
See the ‘TIMES’ Magazine December 30th, 1974, article ‘How true is the Bible?’ And also read ‘50,000 Errors in the Bible?’ a reproduction from the Christian Magazine ‘AWAKE!’ September 8, 1957.
Please note that three different and distinct questions were posed to John the Baptist and to which he gave three emphatic ‘NO’s as answers. To recapitulate:
1) Art thou the Christ?
2) Art thou Elias?
3) Art thou that Prophet?
But the learned men of Christendom somehow only see two questions implied here. To make doubly clear that the Jews definitely had T-H-R-E-E separate prophecies in their minds when they were interrogating John the Baptist, let us read the remonstrance of the Jews in the verses following:
‘And they asked him, and said unto him, why baptizest thou then, if thou be
a) not that Christ,
b) nor Elias,
c) neither that prophet?’ (John 1:25)
The Jews were waiting for the fulfillment of THREE distinct prophecies: ‘One’, the coming of Christ. ‘Two’, the coming of Elias, and ‘Three’, the coming of that prophet.
If we look up any Bible which has a concordance or cross-references, we will find in the marginal note where the words ‘the Prophet’, or ‘that Prophet’ occur in John 1:25, that these words refer to the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:15 and 18. And that ‘that prophet’ – ‘the prophet like Moses’ – ‘like unto thee’, we have proved through overwhelming evidence that he was Muhammad and not Jesus!
We Muslims are not denying that Jesus was the ‘Messiah’, which word is translated as ‘Christ’. We are not contesting the ‘thousand and one prophecies’ which the Christians claim abound in the Old Testament foretelling the coming of the Messiah. What we say is that Deuteronomy 18:18 does NOT refer to Jesus Christ but it is instead an explicit prophecy about the Holy Prophet Muhammad!’
– How the word Messiah was transmuted to Christ? See Christ in Islam
The dominee very politely parted with me by saying that it was a very interesting discussion and he would like me very much to come one day and address his congregation on the subject. A decade and half has passed since then but I am still awaiting that privilege. I believe the dominee was sincere when he made the offer, but prejudices die hard and who would like to loose his sheep?
The acid test
To the lambs of Christ I say, why not apply that acid test which the Master himself wanted you to apply to any would be claimant to Prophethood? He had said: ‘by their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes from the thorns, or figs from the thistles? every good tree will bear good fruit and every evil tree will bear evil fruit… by their fruits ye shall know them. (Matthew 7:16-20).
Why are you afraid to apply this test to the teachings of Muhammad? You will find in the Last Testament of God – the Quran – the true fulfillment of the teachings of Moses and Jesus, which will bring to the world the much-needed peace and happiness.
‘If a man like Mohamed were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness.’ (George Bernard Shaw)
The Weekly Newsmagazine ‘TIME’ dated July 15, 1974, carried a selection of opinions by various historians, writers, military men, businessmen and others on the subject: ‘Who Were History’s Great Leaders?’ Some said that it was Hitler; others said – Gandhi, Buddha, Lincoln and the like. But Jules Masserman, a United States psychoanalyst put the standards straight by giving the correct criteria wherewith to judge. He said:
Leaders must fulfil three functions:
(1) Provide for the well-being of the led,
(2) Provide a social organization in which people feel relatively secure and
(3) Provide them with one set of beliefs.’
With the above three criteria he searches history and analyses – Hitler, Pasteur, Caesar, Moses, Confucius and the lot, and ultimately concludes:
‘People like Pasteur and Salk are leaders in the first sense. People like Gandhi and Confucius, on one hand, and Alexander, Caesar and Hitler on the other, are leaders in the second and perhaps the third sense. Jesus and Buddha belong in the third category alone. Perhaps the greatest leader of all times was Mohammed, who combined all three functions. To a lesser degree, Moses did the same.’
According to the objective standards set by the Professor of the Chicago University, whom I believe to be Jewish, – Jesus and Buddha are now – here in the picture of the ‘Great Leaders of Mankind’, but by a queer coincidence groups Moses and Muhammad together thus adding further weight to the argument that Jesus is not like Moses, but Muhammad is like Moses: Deut.18:18 ‘like unto thee’ – Like Moses!
I end with a quotation of a Christian Reverend the commentator of the Bible, followed by that of his Master: ‘The ultimate criterion of a true prophet is the moral character of his teaching.’ (Prof. Dummelow.)
‘By their fruits ye shall know them.’ (Jesus Christ)
Come let us reason together say: ’O people of the book! Come to common terms as between us and you: That we worship none but God; that we associate no partners with Him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, lords and patrons other than God.’ If then they turn back, say: ‘Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to God’s will).’ (Quran 3:64)
‘People of the book’ is the respectful title given to the Jews and the Christians in the Quran. The Muslims is here commanded to invite – ‘O People of the Book!’ – O Learned People! O People who claim to be the recipients of Divine Revelation, of a Holy Scripture; let us gather together onto a common platform – ‘that we worship none but God’, because none but God is worthy of worship, not because ‘The lord thy God is a Jealous God visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me.’ (Exodus 20:25).
But because He is our Lord and Cherisher, our Sustainer and Evolver, worthy of all praise, prayer and devotion.
In the abstract the Jews and the Christians would agree to all of the three propositions contained in this Quranic verse. In practice they fail. Apart from doctrinal lapses from the unity of the One True God, there is the question of a consecrated Priesthood (among the Jews it was hereditary also), as if a mere human being – Cohen or Pope, or Priest, or Brahman, – could claim superiority apart from his learning and the purity of his life, or could stand between man and God in some special sense. Islam does not recognise priesthood!
The Creed of Islam is given to us here in a nutshell from Quran:
Say ye: ‘We believe in Allah, And the revelation given to us, And to Abraham, Isma’il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, And that given to Moses and Jesus and that given to (all) Prophets from their Lord: we make no difference between one and another of them: and we bow to Allah (in Islam).’ (Quran 2:136)
The Muslim position is clear. The Muslim does not claim to have a religion peculiar to himself. Islam is not a sect or an ethnic religion. In its view all Religion is one, for the Truth is one. It was the same religion preached by all the earlier prophets.
It was the truth taught by all the inspired books. In essence it amounts to a consciousness of the Will and Plan of God and a joyful submission to that Will and Plan. If anyone wants a religion other than that, he is false to his own nature, as he is false to God’s Will and Plan. Such a one cannot expect guidance, for he has deliberately renounced guidance.